Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Marco Trungelliti vs Hazem Naow Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Trungelliti vs Naow analysis and find out who is favored!
Want To Bet On This Match?
After checking out our Predictions and stats analysis, we recommend opening accounts at several Sportsbooks so you can get the best possible odds for the outcome. We recommend:
BetOnline
Our favorite for great odds and reliable service with a 50% Welcome Bonus (up to $1000) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Bwin
Best for European users. Regional Welcome BonusesBetMGM
First bet offer, Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t winSportsBetting
Competitive odds. First Deposit Doubled (up to $500) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Cashwin
Variety of betting options and 100% Welcome Bonus + 3 Months FREE Matchstat*- Bet365:
With competitive odds and live betting. Regional signup bonuses!
* To claim FREE Matchstat for 3 months – Click Here
If you’re not ready for real bets and want to practice, sign up for FREE at www.meerkatbet.com Enjoy simulated betting with our virtual currency, learn about value bets, and compete for monthly prizes in a risk-free environment.
Marco Trungelliti vs Hazem Naow Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Trungelliti 0 - 0 Naow
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Trungelliti has won 51.3% of points on their second serve, while Naow has won 47.62%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Trungelliti, in recent form, has won 52.96% of their opponent's second serve points, while Naow has won 55.87%. The same stats for first serve returns are 32.85% and 34.37% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Trungelliti has saved 63.25% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Naow has saved 62.16% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Trungelliti has won 65.82% of matches played (W/L 52/ 27), with Naow winning 67.57% (W/L 50/ 24) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Trungelliti has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 62% (W/L 433/ 271), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 38% (W/L 15/ 25). Naow has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 71% (W/L 65/ 27), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 58% (W/L 56/ 41).
- Player level: In the last year, Trungelliti has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 62.96% of matches (W/L 34/ 20), where as Naow has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 73.81% of matches (W/L 31/ 11). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Trungelliti has played against opponents with an average rank of 220.66 while Naow has played against players with an average rank of 191.53.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Trungelliti has won 59% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Naow has won 67% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Trungelliti has converted 45% of breakpoint opportunities, and Naow has converted 40.76% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
151
Rank
112
High
34
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
348
Rank
323
High
24
Age
Plays
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
Form
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
W
59% (540-377)
Career Total W/L
65% (153-83)
67% (30-15)
YTD W/L
68% (28-13)
$983,613
Career Prize Money
$0
1
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Marco Trungelliti vs Hazem Naow For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Trungelliti VS Naow
Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t win!
Welcome bonuses
First Deposit Doubled
(Up to $500 is doubled on initial deposit)
+
Regional Signup Bonuses
With competitive adds and live betting
Trungelliti VS Naow H2h Matches played
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Marco Trungelliti | Hazem Naow |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 67% (30/15) | 68% (28/13) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 61% (66/42) | 64% (58/33) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (547/477) | 55% (462/385) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 56% (5/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 72% (23/9) | 56% (9/7) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (1/1) | 76% (19/6) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.25 | 0.23 |
| Aces Total | 126 | 95 |
| DFs per game | 0.22 | 0.38 |
| DFs Total | 110 | 156 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:49:45 | 1:37:33 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 209.64 | 239.59 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (1944/3213) | 63% (1755/2804) |
| 1st Serve W% | 69% (1349/1944) | 69% (1210/1755) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 51% (651/1269) | 48% (504/1049) |
| BPs Won% Total | 45% (144/320) | 42% (138/329) |
| Return Pts W% | 41% (1309/3229) | 43% (1185/2770) |
| Slam W/L | 40% (2/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 71% (5/2) | 0% (0/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 70% (23/10) | 67% (16/8) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 75% (12/4) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 67% (29/43) | 68% (28/41) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 54% (7/13) | 56% (5/9) |
| Deciding Set W% | 65% (13/20) | 78% (7/9) |
| 1st set W, W | 86% (29/25) | 100% (24/24) |
| 1st set W, L | 14% (29/4) | 0% (24/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 31% (16/5) | 24% (17/4) |
Marco Trungelliti Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Khumoun Sultanov
Player
Marco Trungelliti
60%
(
68 of
113)
1st Serve %
53%
(
48 of
90)
5
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
1
72%
(
49 of
68)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
47%
(
21 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
38%
(
43 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
34 of
90)
104
Total Points Won
99
|
3-6 7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Elias Ymer
Player
Marco Trungelliti
60%
(
53 of
88)
1st Serve %
60%
(
65 of
108)
13
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
79%
(
42 of
53)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
43 of
65)
63%
(
22 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
27%
(
24 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
43 of
108)
107
Total Points Won
89
|
6-7(4) 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Marco Trungelliti
Player
Facundo Bagnis
59%
(
17 of
29)
1st Serve %
63%
(
19 of
30)
4
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
88%
(
15 of
17)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
13 of
19)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
5 of
29)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
36
Total Points Won
23
|
6-3 1-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jerome Kym
Player
Marco Trungelliti
70%
(
80 of
115)
1st Serve %
57%
(
62 of
109)
7
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
7
68%
(
54 of
80)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
43 of
62)
40%
(
14 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
41%
(
47 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
41 of
109)
109
Total Points Won
115
|
1-6 7-6(4) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marco Trungelliti
Player
Ivan Gakhov
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve %
68%
(
34 of
50)
2
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
85%
(
11 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
6 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
23 of
50)
55
Total Points Won
33
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Chun Hsin Tseng
Player
Marco Trungelliti
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve %
63%
(
29 of
46)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
0
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
57
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Marco Trungelliti
Player
Tomas Barrios Vera
63%
(
63 of
100)
1st Serve %
60%
(
57 of
95)
5
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
62%
(
39 of
63)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
35 of
57)
43%
(
16 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
6 of
8)
45%
(
45 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
43 of
95)
98
Total Points Won
97
|
2-6 6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Marco Trungelliti
Player
Nerman Fatic
63%
(
60 of
95)
1st Serve %
71%
(
63 of
89)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
1
68%
(
41 of
60)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
35 of
63)
37%
(
13 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
43%
(
41 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
42 of
89)
96
Total Points Won
88
|
6-3 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Marco Trungelliti
Player
Jacopo Berrettini
57%
(
30 of
53)
1st Serve %
68%
(
46 of
68)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
68)
69
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marco Trungelliti
Player
Lorenzo Carboni
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve %
64%
(
32 of
50)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
21%
(
3 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
16 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
59
Total Points Won
39
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Hazem Naow Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Hazem Naow
Player
Elmer Moller
58%
(
49 of
85)
1st Serve %
59%
(
46 of
78)
3
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
6
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
41%
(
35 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
36 of
78)
86
Total Points Won
77
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rafael Izquierdo Luque
Player
Hazem Naow
58%
(
42 of
72)
1st Serve %
63%
(
33 of
52)
0
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
5
50%
(
21 of
42)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
11%
(
2 of
19)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
47%
(
34 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
68
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ricardas Berankis
Player
Hazem Naow
58%
(
38 of
66)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
69)
10
Aces
9
5
Double Faults
8
87%
(
33 of
38)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
31 of
39)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
19 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
24 of
69)
71
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Lucas Gerch
Player
Hazem Naow
49%
(
32 of
65)
1st Serve %
53%
(
39 of
73)
3
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
4
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
45%
(
29 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
37 of
73)
73
Total Points Won
65
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Federico Iannaccone
Player
Hazem Naow
95%
(
54 of
57)
1st Serve %
69%
(
37 of
54)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
33%
(
1 of
3)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
35%
(
20 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
67
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Hazem Naow
Player
Nicolas Alvarez Varona
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve %
85%
(
52 of
61)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
38%
(
19 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
33 of
61)
64
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Riccardo Bonadio
Player
Hazem Naow
50%
(
24 of
48)
1st Serve %
55%
(
41 of
74)
7
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
9
75%
(
18 of
24)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
11 of
33)
26%
(
5 of
19)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
31%
(
15 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
40 of
74)
73
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Henri Squire
Player
Hazem Naow
58%
(
28 of
48)
1st Serve %
59%
(
24 of
41)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
33%
(
16 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
56
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Buvaysar Gadamauri
Player
Hazem Naow
66%
(
66 of
100)
1st Serve %
67%
(
51 of
76)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
64%
(
42 of
66)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
37 of
51)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
39%
(
39 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
28 of
76)
89
Total Points Won
87
|
6-4 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Hazem Naow
Player
Mae Malige
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve %
36%
(
15 of
42)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
58
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Trungelliti Vs Naow Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Trungelliti are available here and Naow photos here.
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Hazem Naow
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
